Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Malmstrom v. State of Utah Department of Children And Families

United States District Court, D. Utah, Northern Division

February 7, 2018

PARKER MALMSTROM and CRYSTAL MALMSTROM, Plaintiffs,
v.
STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Defendants.

          Evelyn J. Furse Magistrate Judge.

          MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING [102] REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

          David Nuffer United States District Judge.

         The Report and Recommendation[1] issued by United States Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on January 11, 2018 recommends[2] that all of Plaintiff Parker Malmstrom’s claims[3] against Nancy Trotter, Thomas Malmstrom, and David Blum be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.[4]

         The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within 14 days of its service pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72.[5] As Plaintiffs were mailed a copy of the Report and Recommendation, they were provided an additional three days to file their objection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). Because the last day of the 17 day period to file an objection would have been Sunday, January 28, 2018, the objection period was extended one day until the end of Monday, January 29, 2018 under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1)(C).

         On January 30, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a document entitled “Objection to Magistrate’s Decision and Order Or Motion to Set Aside Magistrate’s.”[6] The document does not specify which Report and Recommendation is the subject of the objection and it does not appear to deal with subjects in this Report and Recommendation. In addition to the lack of specificity, the filing[7] is untimely as to this Report and Recommendation. Because no party filed a timely written objection to the Report and Recommendation as provided by court rules,[8] and because the analysis and conclusion are sound, the Report and Recommendation[9] is adopted in its entirety.

         ORDER

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation[10] is ADOPTED and Defendants Blum, Malmstrom and Trotter’s Motion to Dismiss[11] is GRANTED. Plaintiff Parker Malmstrom’s claims against Nancy Trotter, Thomas Malmstrom, and David Blum are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

---------

Notes:

[1] Report and Recommendation: David Blum, Thomas Malmstrom & Nancy Trotter’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11), docket no. 102, filed January 11, 2017.

[2] Id. at 12.

[3] Pro se Plaintiff Parker Malmstrom filed his Complaint on May 16, 2017. See Complaint, docket no. 1, filed May 17, 2017. He then filed an Amended Complaint on May 16, 2017. See Amended Complaint, docket no. 3, filed May 23, 2017. The Amended Complaint joined his mother, Crystal Malmstrom, as a Plaintiff. See Id. At Oral Argument, Crystal Malmstrom clarified that she is only bringing claims against Defendant Jacob Smith. See Minute Order, Proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse: Motion Hearing, docket no. 88, filed September 12, 2017. Because of this clarification, the Report and Recommendation only address Parker Malmstrom’s claims against Nancy Trotter, Thomas Malmstrom, and David Blum.

[4] See Defendants Blum, Malmstrom and Trotter’s Motion to Dismiss, docket no. 11, filed ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.